User talk:Agiletek

That's fair, I regretted the sassy part soon after writing it. Thank you for merging the two.

Star Trek ContinuesEdit

I think you need to look at the edit you made on the Star Trek Continues blurb, because you make the same statement twice. Also, from where are you referencing the assertion that the lead's own friends were the ones that made the allegations? --Cavgunner (talk) 04:43, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

They waited 8 years before making accusations and remained (as far as he and any outsider observer could tell) friends for those 8 years before they made the accusations. That's not a redundant statement. --Agiletek (talk) 19:46, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
They who? How do we know they were friends? Where is this stated? --Cavgunner (talk) 02:31, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
The ones he's sueing. How much detail do we need for this? I doubt we need to cover every detail of an ongoing legal cases of a subject that has a secondary importance to a subject itself already of secondary importance to /tg/? --Agiletek (talk) 03:51, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
To be honest I'm not sure that that 8-year thing should be mentioned at all, in my personal opinion it's going deeper into the weeds than is really necessary for a small blurb.--Cavgunner (talk) 15:35, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
It's a pretty simple part that deeply characterizes it. --Agiletek (talk) 18:18, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
I understand that you think so, but what I'm trying to convey to you is that it's not written in a clear and concise manner, even after your last edit.--Cavgunner (talk) 00:52, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
If you're worried about the page itself, the talk page for that article would be a better place to put this given I'm the only person going to check this talk page. --Agiletek (talk) 01:52, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Agiletek".