Changes

User talk:Root

1,443 bytes added, 02:05, 21 October 2019
no edit summary
You know what? Sure, ban me and undo all my edits. If this is the kind of content to be expected from "the higher ups", the main editors, if Triacom and Newerfag not only have said they're SJWs and want to make their content unfair to opposing views because of "balance fallacies", if you want to come at me calling arguments against whining "bad faith", if you want to use an actual buzzword, "sealioning", against me, the same one used by actual SJWs against their opposition, and if you two make up so much content on this site, it's not even worth trying to salvage. I'm pissing in the wind against people who never intended to actually argue or discuss things in the first place, just get their way, kick neutral POVs to the curb, and curtail anyone who would even dare argue against their eminence and such enlightened facts, such as the Cthulhu Mythos relying solely on racism for its existence. I gave it a go, and at least the Talk pages will stay up as proof of what direction content's heading in if those users keep forcing their way onto others. Can't argue, that's sealioning. Can't dispute, that's disingenuous. Can't be neutral, that's false balance. Can't try to defend your side, they'll flail around until you're banned. Either way, who gives a fuck? If I'm a sealion, then I'm jumping ship. It isn't worth it anymore. Adios. [[User:TheBadageBoys|TheBadageBoys]] ([[User talk:TheBadageBoys|talk]]) 01:54, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
:All this whining, and you could have just walked away like an adult. Go and tell your /pol/ack friends not to waste our time any further, will you?--[[User:Newerfag|Newerfag]] ([[User talk:Newerfag|talk]]) 02:04, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
:Once again, you're making up a lot of shit here, and just in case you're still around, please post a quote, just a single quote from either myself or Newerfag that shows you're not spewing bullshit. Post a quote from either of us where we said we're SJW's. Post a quote from either of us where you can point to it and say "that's just whining". Tell us how sealioning is just a buzzword and not the argument strategy you've been using, and explain to us how calling other people virtue-signalling soapboxers and saying you're trying to be civil at the same time isn't sealioning. I've reached compromise with you in the past, only this time you've refused to listen to anyone but yourself and when confronted with a genuine article that proves my point, the best you can do is mock the site it was posted on, as if "1d4chan" all of a sudden cares about ridiculous site names. You can argue all you want, claiming that you're being civil while name-calling is sealioning, quoting arguments that were never made or pretending that a user said something they didn't is being disingenuous, and claiming you were being personally attacked when you never were is lying. If you actually had anything backing you up besides your opinion and if you didn't say you were no longer interested in discussion when sources were cited then we wouldn't be here right now. -- [[User:Triacom|Triacom]] ([[User talk:Triacom|talk]]) 02:05, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
7,301
edits