5 May 2018
24 April 2017
16 February 2017
11 October 2016
17 November 2015
Thank you for providing a coherent argument, rather than a nonsensical sperg. Your point is valid, and I have been convinced.
Undo revision 314317 by Asorel (talk)HOly shit, why the hell would you delete a useful Link-page? This is something that's about as useful in wiki edits as Rape, Distraction Carnifex, Rage, and Derp
Again, defending the honor of page creators is not grounds for keeping a useless page active. What they think is irrelevant if it is not reflective of reality.
Undo revision 314304 by Asorel (talk) - Of course not, however it's a very common term here, so if they thought they should be informative, then let them.
Yes, it is. I don't give a shit if they 'thought' it was necessary, that doesn't make it so. Is that the entire pretense of your white knighting? Protecting the fee-fees of the poor, innocent contributors?
Undo revision 314298 by Asorel (talk) - Of course not, however there's no reason deleting an article written by somebody else if they wanted to explain something.
Are you so retarded that you need an entire article explaining what "over" and "costed" mean to you?
Undo revision 314286 by Asorel (talk) - This is even more /tg/ related then many things you've marked for deletion.